ArticleCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2025
Content analysis of oral hygiene instruction posts on Instagram: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social media platforms such as Instagram have emerged as alternative sources for oral hygiene instructions. This cross-sectional study evaluates the usefulness, understandability, and actionability of Instagram oral hygiene instruction posts. Methods: A systematic search of Instagram posts was conducted using the hashtags #dentalhygiene and #oralhygiene. The first 100 posts meeting the inclusion criteria for each hashtag were evaluated using 2 tools: the Oral Hygiene Content Usefulness Score (OHCUS), a newly developed scoring system, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). The OHCUS assessed the quality and clinical value of posts, while PEMAT evaluated their understandability and actionability. Statistical analysis included the Mann- Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman's correlation. Results: Among the 200 posts, 110 were videos and 90 were photos. The average number of likes was 2,981.92 (±9,635.64), and the average number of views for videos was 196,583 (±933,509). Seventy-one percent of posts were educational. The mean usefulness score was 2.37 (±1.94), the mean understandability score was 74.4% (±14.87%), and the actionability score averaged 35.6% (±24.37%). Discussion: Posts from oral health professionals, including dental hygienists, were more useful, understandable, and actionable than posts from other sources, with most posts shared by dental clinic accounts. Conclusions: Social media, particularly Instagram, has potential as a platform for disseminating oral health education. However, the quality and reliability of the information vary significantly. Posts from oral health professionals, especially dental hygienists, are more beneficial. Enhancing the quality and accuracy of social media content is crucial to maximizing its public health impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40809530PMC12341504What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.