ReviewBiomaterials and biosystems2025
Gynecologic postoperative anti-adhesion barriers: From biomaterials to barrier development.
Review in Biomaterials and biosystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention of adhesive small bowel obstruction by anti-adhesion barriers: do they really work?Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Review
- Effects of a Lidocaine-Loaded Alginate/CMC/PEO Electrospun Nanofiber Film on Postoperative Pain and Peritoneal Adhesion in a Rat Model.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Pathologic, Laboratory, and Surgical Findings of Topical Statin Gels (Simvastatin, Atorvastatin, and Rosuvastatin) in a Rat Model of Peritoneal Endometriosis.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomaterials for Reproductive Restoration: Translating Engineering Innovations.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Intraoperative Adhesion Barrier Use in Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometriosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study on Long-Term Recurrence and Pelvic Pain.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Evaluation Starch-Based Hemostatic Agents "BioSight" as Adhesion Prevention Barrier Tested in an Adhesion Model in Rats.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecologic postoperative adhesions (GPOA) remain an under-appreciated source of morbidity despite advances in minimally invasive surgery. Adhesions forming after myomectomy, extensive endometriosis excision, repeat caesarean section, or hysteroscopic adhesiolysis develop in 20 - 90 % of patients and account for up to 40 % of secondary infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel obstruction, and life-threatening obstetric complications such as placenta accreta spectrum. Because the uterus is hormonally responsive and destined for potential pregnancy, anti-adhesion barriers for gynecologic tissues must meet stricter criteria for biocompatibility, resorption timing, teratogenic safety, and reproductive regulatory classification than barriers designed for bowel or tendon repair. This review consolidates the rapidly expanding literature on biomaterial-based barriers specifically tailored for gynecologic applications. We first dissect the pathophysiology of uterine and adnexal adhesion formation-including mesothelial disruption, fibrin persistence, and estrogen-modulated wound remodeling-to highlight design targets unique to the female reproductive tract. Next, we critically appraise natural and synthetic polymers, discussing how formulation parameters govern in-vivo elimination or excretion routes and influence fertility outcomes. Cutting-edge fabrication strategies-such as electrospinning, 3D bioprinting, melt electrowriting, Janus hydrogels, and microneedle patches-are reviewed with an eye toward uterine conformity, minimally invasive deployability, and on-demand release of drugs or exosomes. We further map current FDA-cleared films (INTERCEED™, Seprafilm®, SurgiWrap®) against unmet gynecologic needs, delineate limitations, and identify opportunities for multifunctional, self-healing, image-visible, and patient-specific barrier platforms. By framing adhesion prevention through a gynecologic lens, this article provides clinicians, materials scientists, and device developers with a roadmap for translating next-generation barriers from bench to bedside, ultimately reducing infertility, surgical re-admission, and obstetric risk in women worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.