ArticleCardiology research2025
History of COVID-19 as a Risk Factor for Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Case-Control Study.
Article in Cardiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and generated high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide, as well as several sequelae that persist and need to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between a history of COVID-19 infection and the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias in outpatients from a private clinic in Arequipa. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, analytical, unmatched case-control study in a private cardiology clinic in Arequipa, Peru. A total of 252 adult patients who underwent 24-h Holter monitoring between October and December 2023 were included. Cases were defined as patients with documented cardiac arrhythmias; controls had no arrhythmic findings. The main exposure was a confirmed history of COVID-19. Age, sex, and additional Holter findings were also analyzed. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age and sex. Results: Of the total sample, 68 patients were classified as cases and 184 as controls. A history of COVID-19 was more frequent among cases (70.6%) than among controls (50.5%) (P = 0.004). In unadjusted analysis, patients with prior COVID-19 had more than twice the odds of presenting arrhythmias (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.29 - 4.26; P = 0.005). After adjusting for age and sex, the association remained statistically significant (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.10 - 4.11; P = 0.025). Conclusion: A prior history of COVID-19 was significantly associated with increased odds of cardiac arrhythmias. These findings highlight the importance of structured cardiac evaluation in patients with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.