Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40810307›Full record

ReviewCardiology journal2025

Artificial Intelligence based fractional flow reserve.

Adrian Bednarek, Paweł Gąsior, Miłosz Jaguszewski, Piotr P Buszman, Krzysztof Milewski, Michał Hawranek, Robert Gil, Wojciech Wojakowski, Janusz Kochman, Mariusz Tomaniak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Adrian BednarekFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3600-4551
Paweł GąsiorDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Miłosz JaguszewskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Piotr P BuszmanDepartment of Cardiology, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Bielsko-Biala, Poland.
Krzysztof MilewskiAcademy of Silesia, Faculty of Medicine, Katowice, Poland.
Michał HawranekThird Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Robert GilDepartment of Cardiology, National Medical Institute of Internal Affairs and Administration Ministry, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech WojakowskiDivision of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Janusz KochmanFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Mariusz TomaniakFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. mariusz.tomaniak@wum.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-1393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) - a physiological indicator of coronary stenosis significance - has now become a widely used parameter also in the guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Several studies have shown the superiority of FFR compared to visual assessment, contributing to the reduction in clinical endpoints. However, the current approach to FFR assessment requires coronary instrumentation with a dedicated pressure wire and thus increasing invasiveness, cost, and duration of the procedure. Alternative, noninvasive methods of FFR assessment based on computational fluid dynamics are being widely tested; these approaches are generally not fully automated and may sometimes require substantial computational power. Nowadays, one of the most rapidly expanding fields in medicine is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in therapy optimization, diagnosis, treatment, and risk stratification. AI usage contributes to the development of more sophisticated methods of imaging analysis and allows for the derivation of clinically important parameters in a faster and more accurate way. Over the recent years, AI utility in deriving FFR in a noninvasive manner has been increasingly reported. In this review, we critically summarize current knowledge in the field of AI-derived FFR based on data from computed tomography angiography, invasive angiography, optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound. Available solutions, possible future directions in optimizing cathlab performance, including the use of mixed reality, as well as current limitations standing behind the wide adoption of these techniques, are overviewed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialCoronary AngiographyHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsTomography, Optical Coherenceartificial intelligencecomputational fluid dynamicscoronary physiologydeep learningfractional flow reservemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40810307
PMCPMC12582773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.