ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Brain lesions in pediatric abusive head trauma: prevalence, pathophysiology, patterns, and a classification system.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based detection of retinal hemorrhages in a multicenter cohort of abusive head trauma.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Forensic neuropathology: 2026 update.Free neuropathology · 2026Review
- Guidance for a clinical and forensic diagnosis of pediatric abusive head trauma: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- A minimally invasive, scalable and reproducible neonatal rat model of severe focal brain injury.Brain communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesA deeper understanding of extensive brain lesions (EBL) in pediatric abusive head trauma (AHT) could possibly help differentiate AHT from other forms of trauma. Therefore, the aims of the study were (i) to investigate the prevalence and features of AHT-associated EBL in neuroimaging and (ii) to develop a useful classification system. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study analyzed cranial CT and/or MRI of medico-legally well-documented AHT cases diagnosed with "shaken baby syndrome" from a 10-year study period with respect to lesions in cerebrum, cerebellum, and brain stem. For the development of a classification system, EBLs were grouped into distinct lesion patterns based on laterality, symmetry, distribution, and shape.
resultsA total of 61 AHT cases were included. Comparison between "confession cases" (n = 15) and "non-confession cases" (n = 46) did not show any statistically significant difference regarding all parameters analysed. EBL were found in ~ 1/3 of the cases (n = 20). Brain stem lesions were only rarely observed (n = 2). Nine different and partly new patterns of EBL occurring in AHT by shaking are described. Pattern analysis revealed that most lesions can be caused by hypoxic-ischemic injury, but evidence is provided that additional pathomechanisms, such as hypoglycemia and the "second impact syndrome", may be causative or a component.
conclusionsBrain lesions in AHT by shaking form typical patterns that can be categorized. Considering the rare observation of brain stem lesions, the widespread hypothesis of primary brain stem lesions leading to initial respiratory insufficiency in AHT by shaking should be questioned. KEY POINTS: Question Current data on extensive brain lesion patterns in abusive head trauma are insufficient with regard to nomenclature, pathophysiology, and a classification system. Findings Nine different patterns of extensive brain lesions were found in abusive head trauma by shaking, which indicates different pathomechanisms and may help diagnose child abuse. Clinical relevance Consideration of the identified lesion patterns provides new insights into underlying pathomechanisms and supports the clinical diagnosis of abusive head trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.