ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2025
COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage and Associated Factors Among Underserved Communities in South Carolina: Results from a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in reducing adverse health outcomes is well-documented. However, vaccine uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among minority populations in the USA. We estimated COVID-19 vaccination coverage and investigated factors associated with vaccination status among adults in underserved communities in South Carolina.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among barbershop and salon clients (n = 330) in six counties from August to November 2023. Data were collected on demographics, health status, vaccination history for COVID-19 and the flu, concerns regarding COVID-19, and sources of health information. The likelihood of partial and full vaccination compared to no vaccination was estimated using multinomial logistic regression models.
resultsAbout 19.4% were fully vaccinated, and 54.5% were partially vaccinated. Not receiving a flu vaccine in the past year and worrying about vaccine safety were associated with reduced likelihood of partial or full vaccination. Increased age and worry about the spread of COVID-19 were associated with an increased likelihood of vaccination. Receiving COVID-19-related information from family/friends or healthcare providers was associated with an increased likelihood of full vaccination but not partial vaccination. Religious affiliation, having no chronic health conditions, and prior COVID-19 infection were associated with a lower likelihood of partial vaccination but not full vaccination.
conclusionThe findings highlight public health concerns surrounding vaccination, the influence of religion, perceptions of invulnerability, and the role of trusted sources in vaccine decision-making. Public health messaging promoting vaccination should address these concerns and target populations often underserved by conventional healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40810893What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.