Evidence mapPaperPMID 40810985Full record

SynthesisJAMA ophthalmology2025

Ocular Adverse Events With Semaglutide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gabriella R Natividade, Bernardo F Spiazzi, Matheus W Baumgarten, Caroline Bassotto, Afonso A Pereira, Bruna L Fraga, Bruno G Scalco, Nicole R Mattes, Daniel Lavinsky, Caroline K Kramer and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriella R NatividadeFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Bernardo F SpiazziPost-graduate Program in Medical Sciences: Endocrinology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Matheus W BaumgartenDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Caroline BassottoDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Afonso A PereiraDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Bruna L FragaFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Bruno G ScalcoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Nicole R MattesFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Daniel LavinskyFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Caroline K KramerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Mount Sinai hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fernando GerchmanFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Semaglutide is a widely used treatment for diabetes and obesity, offering considerable cardiovascular benefit. However, its association with ocular adverse events remains uncertain. Objective: To assess the incidence of eye disorders, diabetic retinopathy, and nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in adults treated with semaglutide. Data Sources: A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted on April 10, 2025, without date restrictions. Study Selection: Investigators independently screened records to identify randomized clinical trials comparing semaglutide with either an active comparator or placebo in adults, assessing ocular adverse events. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Descriptive synthesis of the included studies was performed. The random-effects model using the inverse variance method was used to summarize the odds ratio (OR) for eye disorders and diabetic retinopathy. Peto OR with a fixed-effects model was applied for NAION. Risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2.0 tool and quality of evidence with GRADE. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to determine whether the available data were sufficient for definitive conclusions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes included the number of patients experiencing an ocular adverse event, diabetic retinopathy, or NAION. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on follow-up duration, comparator type, and primary baseline condition. Results: A total of 78 trials with 73 640 participants were included. Semaglutide did not increase or reduce the risk of eye disorders (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91-1.12) or diabetic retinopathy (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Treatment with semaglutide was associated with a significant odds of NAION (OR, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.02-15.02). Overall risk of bias was low. TSA provided evidence that the sample size was sufficient to avoid missing alternative results for diabetic retinopathy but not for NAION. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that semaglutide was not associated with an increased risk of eye disorders or diabetic retinopathy. Despite the fact that an association between semaglutide treatment and NAION was found, current evidence remains insufficient to establish definitive conclusions regarding its association with NAION. Further studies with larger sample sizes and adequate evaluation of NAION are warranted to clarify this potential risk.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsOptic Neuropathy, IschemicGlucagon-Like Peptide 1HumansIncidenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSemaglutideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsSemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID40810985
PMCPMC12355393

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.