ArticlePloS one2025
Filling gaps in PM2.5 time series: A broad evaluation from statistical to advanced neural network models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Winter inversions and summer smoke: A season-dependent approach to PM₂.₅ modeling with low-cost sensors in complex terrain.The Science of the total environment · 2026Article
- DynamicSeq2SeqXGB for PM2.5 imputation in extremely sparse environmental monitoring networks.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addressed the critical challenge of filling gaps in PM2.5 time series data from Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. We developed and evaluated a comprehensive hierarchy of 46 gap-filling methods across five representative gap lengths (5-72 hours), introducing dynamic models capable of adapting to gaps of variable duration. Tree-based models with bidirectional sequence-to-sequence architectures delivered superior performance, with XGB Seq2Seq achieving a mean absolute error of 5.231 ± 0.292 μg/m3 for 12-hour gaps, representing a 63% improvement over basic statistical methods. The advantage of multivariate models incorporating meteorological variables increased substantially with gap length, from modest improvements of 2-3% for 5-hour gaps to significant enhancements of 16-18% for 48-72 hour gaps. Dynamic multivariate models demonstrated remarkable operational flexibility by successfully processing real-world gaps ranging from 1 to 191 hours despite being trained on maximum lengths of 72 hours. Analysis of the reconstructed complete time series revealed that 61.2% of monitored hours exceeded the WHO daily threshold of 15 μg/m3, with strong seasonal patterns and pronounced diurnal cycles. This research advances environmental monitoring capabilities by providing robust methodological tools for addressing data continuity challenges that currently limit the utility of PM2.5 measurements for public health applications and scientific analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.