Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40812749›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2025

EQ Health and Wellbeing EQ-HWB: A Psychometric Assessment Across 6 Conditions and the General Population in the United Kingdom.

Anju Devianee Keetharuth, Clara Mukuria, Tessa Peasgood, Allan Wailoo

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Qualitative testing of the EQ-HWB-9 with a 'blank' EQ-HWB VAS and EQ-5D-5L with skin bolt-ons in a rare genetic skin disease population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anju Devianee KeetharuthSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK. Electronic address: d.keetharuth@sheffield.ac.uk.
Clara MukuriaSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Tessa PeasgoodSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
Allan WailooSheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) tools have been developed to measure and value outcomes of both health and social care interventions, including those of carers, in a manner suitable for use in economic evaluation. The aim of this article is to add to the body of psychometric evidence for the performance of EQ-HWB, and its shorter version EQ-HWB-9, by assessing construct validity and reliability.

methodsA sample of patients (n = 767) across 6 broadly defined health conditions and a sample of the general population (n = 302) completed the EQ-HWB measures alongside other measures. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman and Pearson correlations. Known-group validity was investigated by using several self-reported variables and disease specific questions for the patient sample. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic.

resultsConvergent validity between EQ-HWB items and related items from EQ-5D-5L, SWEMWBS, and ICECAP-A was highest in the patient sample. At the scale level, the highest correlations of EQ-HWB summative score and other measures were observed with both PHQ-8 and GAD-7 followed by EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP-A. The EQ-HWB measures showed ability to detect differences in the defined known groups. Comparing across measures, the EQ-HWB measures had the highest standardized effect sizes for groups defined by emotional problems. The EQ-HWB measures were found to be reliable with test-retest reliability being >0.8 for both groups.

conclusionsThe results show that the EQ-HWB measures have promising psychometric properties across both the patient and general populations.

Indexed as

Health StatusPsychometricsQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung AdultEQ-HWBgeneral populationpatient samplepsychometric performancevalidation

Identifiers

PMID40812749
PMCPMC12711454

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.