ArticleScientific reports2025
Reference intervals for leukocyte cell population data in healthy adults in Zigong region, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukocyte cell population data (CPD), obtained through contemporary hematology analyzers, provide critical insights into the functional and morphological states of immune cells. However, clinically relevant reference intervals for these parameters remain scarce, particularly in region-specific populations. This study sought to establish age- and sex-specific reference intervals for CPD parameters in healthy adults residing in Zigong, China. A total of 7,274 individuals were selected after rigorous screening from 10,673 candidates undergoing routine health checkups. Blood samples were analyzed utilizing a Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer. Statistical methods were employed to assess data distribution, identify and exclude outliers, and generate reference intervals by CLSI EP28-A3C guidelines. Significant differences were observed between males and females across multiple CPD parameters, with age-related trends also being identified. Validation with an independent dataset confirmed that over 90% of results fell within the established reference intervals. These findings present the first localized reference standards for CPD parameters in Zigong, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy and supporting clinical decision-making in laboratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.