ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of right ventricular and left atrial function for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Endometriosis, subclinical cardiac remodeling, and cardiovascular risk: mechanistic insights from cardiac magnetic resonance and mediation analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the role of right ventricular (RV) maladaptive response to increased afterload in the early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing (iCPET). This study evaluates biventricular function and its association with exercise performance in HFpEF. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe prospectively recruited 145 patients with suspected HFpEF from two centers, of whom 113 underwent echocardiography, iCPET, and CMR. Patients met the 2016 European Society of Cardiology HFpEF criteria, with iCPET confirming HFpEF as a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) > 15 mmHg at rest and > 25 mmHg at peak exercise. The diagnostic performance of CMR parameters was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsAmong the 113 patients, 72 had HFpEF (68 ± 10 years) and 41 were non-HFpEF (66 ± 11 years). HFpEF patients exhibited significantly reduced resting pulmonary artery compliance. CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain had the highest diagnostic accuracy for HFpEF (AUC 0.805 and 0.776, respectively). A sex disparity was observed in the LA reservoir strain's diagnostic performance, with higher accuracy in males (AUC 0.801) compared to females (AUC 0.559). Additionally, impaired LA reservoir and booster strains, correlated with reduced exercise capacity and increased PCWP during exercise, highlighting their clinical relevance.
conclusionsRV systolic dysfunction and impaired LA strain serve as early HFpEF markers. The more pronounced LA dysfunction in males suggests potential sex-specific differences, underscoring the need to integrate RV and LA strain assessment into HFpEF diagnostics and personalized treatment approaches. KEY POINTS: Question Can cardiac MRI (CMR)-derived RV strain and LA reservoir strain improve the early diagnosis of HFpEF in symptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction? Findings CMR-derived RV longitudinal strain and LA reservoir strain effectively differentiate early HFpEF; diagnostic accuracy of LA strain varies significantly by sex. Clinical relevance CMR-based RV and LA strain measurements enhance early HFpEF detection, with higher diagnostic accuracy in males, supporting sex-specific diagnostic strategies for timely and personalized heart failure care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40813504What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.