Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40813610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Narrowing the gap for city building height predictions.

C Scott Watson, John R Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C Scott WatsonSchool of Geography and water@leeds, University of Leeds, Leeds , LS2 9JT, UK. c.s.watson@leeds.ac.uk.
John R ElliottSchool of Earth and Environment, COMET, University of Leeds, Leeds , LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

Royal Society UF150282UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) NE/S009000/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the 3D evolution of urban environments at high resolution through space and time is crucial for targeting sustainable development and enhancing resilience to hazards but usually requires expensive commercial satellite or aerial imagery. This leads to data scarcity and analytical biases in countries without access to these capabilities. Here we use high (1.5 m) resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from satellite imagery to measure the vertical component of three cities in the Global South (Nairobi, Kathmandu and Quito), which we evaluate against published datasets of modelled heights. Building heights could be determined to < 1 m mean absolute error (MAE) using the DEMs, and 2.2-7.0 m MAE using a deep learning model trained to predict heights using high-resolution satellite imagery. Google's Open Buildings 2.5D Temporal Dataset further improved on our deep learning models for two of the three cities, although tended to overestimate building heights. Constraining the building-scale vertical dimension of urban growth creates new opportunities to quantify population distributions, assess natural hazard exposure and vulnerabilities, and evaluate material consumption for sustainable development. Deep learning derived building heights begin to address global inequalities in data availability but should be evaluated locally alongside reference data to determine biases.

Identifiers

PMID40813610
PMCPMC12354800

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.