Evidence mapPaperPMID 40813902Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Ageing, immune fitness and cancer.

Melissa Dolan, Kendra A Libby, Alison E Ringel, Peter van Galen, Sandra S McAllister

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Overcoming resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. LatentBiomolecules · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Progress in the Immune Mechanism of Microwave Ablation Therapy for Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Melissa DolanHematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Kendra A LibbyRagon Institute of Mass General Brigham, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2050-2940
Alison E RingelRagon Institute of Mass General Brigham, MIT, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Peter van GalenHematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0735-1570
Sandra S McAllisterHematology Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. smcallister1@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-5903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immune system undergoes substantial changes throughout life, with ageing broadly impacting immune cell composition, function and regenerative capacity. Emerging evidence suggests that age-associated changes in immune fitness - the ability to respond to and eliminate infection, pathogens and malignancy while maintaining self-tolerance - reshape antitumour immunity and influence the efficacy of immunotherapies. Technological advances in high-dimensional immunoprofiling have begun to reveal the complex interplay between ageing, immune fitness and cancer biology, uncovering new therapeutic vulnerabilities and challenges. In this Review, we discuss recent insights derived from age-resolved immunoprofiling of the human tumour microenvironment, how ageing haematopoiesis affects immune cells that contribute to the microenvironment and impact cancer progression, and what is known from preclinical modelling about the functional consequences of immune ageing on tumour control. We further highlight emerging age-stratified analyses of treatment responses, which are beginning to inform hypotheses about how ageing shapes immunotherapy outcomes. Together, these perspectives provide a framework for integrating age as a critical biological variable, underscore the need to consider age in both preclinical models and clinical trial design, and identify key challenges and priorities for the field moving forward.

Indexed as

AgingImmune SystemNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansImmunotherapyTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.