ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Competing risk model for prognosis of small cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma based on SEER database.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the incidence of small cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (SCNLC) shows an upward trend. Yet there is still a lack of competing risk models for SCNLC. Therefore, this study aims to establish a competing risk model to predict the specific mortality of patients with SCNLC.
methodsPatients diagnosed with SCNLC from 2000 to 2018 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariable Fine-Gray regression models were used to select independent predictors of SCNLC-specific mortality. A competing risk model was constructed to predict the cumulative 3- and 5-year specific mortality of SCNLC. C-index, ROC curve, and calibration curve were used for internal validation, and the clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis.
resultsA total of 27,758 patients were included in the analysis. The results of feature selection showed that patient’s age, race, marital status, tumor grade, histology, size, stage, and number of tumors were independent risk factors for specific death of patients. The factor that had the greatest impact on SCNLC-specific mortality was stage IV tumor (HR [95%]: 1.51 [1.31, 1.73]; P < 0.0001), followed by brain metastasis among distant metastases (HR [95%]: 1.37 [1.25, 1.49]; P < 0.0001). Based on the model’s C-index and the area under the ROC curve (AUC), the results indicate that this model can effectively predict SCNLC-specific mortality and has good clinical value.
conclusionThe competing risk model for patients with SCNLC was successfully established and validated internally. The validation results suggest that the model is accurate and practical in the prediction of SCNLC-specific mortality and plays an important role in clinical decision-making and health management for patients with SCNLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.