Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40816723›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2025

Training Schedule Affects Operant Responding Independent of Motivation in the Neuroligin-3 R451C Mouse Model of Autism.

Riki Dingwall, Carlos May, Jackson A McDonald, Thomas Hill, Robyn Brown, Andrew J Lawrence, Anthony J Hannan, Emma L Burrows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Riki DingwallThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8167-3826
Carlos MayThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Jackson A McDonaldThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Thomas HillThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Robyn BrownThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew J LawrenceThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Anthony J HannanThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Emma L BurrowsThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6675-4679

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1158460National Health and Medical Research Council-Australian Research Council (NHMRC-ARC) Dementia Research Development Fellowship 1111552TDM Growth Partners and Hearts and Minds InvestmentsUniversity of Melbourne Research ScholarshipVictorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism affects ~1 in 100 people and arises from the interplay between rare genetic changes and the environment. Diagnosis is based on social and communication difficulties, as well as the presence of restricted and repetitive behaviours. Autism aetiology is complex. However, the social motivation hypothesis proposes that an imbalance in the salience of social over non-social stimuli contributes over time to the autism phenotype. Accordingly, motivational dysfunction in autism is widespread, and human imaging data has identified broad impairments to reward processing. The R451C mutation of the neuroligin-3 gene is one such rare genetic change. Knock-in mice harbouring this mutation (NL3) exhibit a range of autism-related phenotypes, including impaired sociability and social motivation. However, no prior report has directly probed non-social motivation. Here, we explore conflicting results from the progressive ratio (PR) and conditioned place preference tasks of non-social motivation. Initial PR results were inconsistent, suggesting reduced, unaltered, and elevated non-social motivation, respectively. Utilising several experimental designs, we probed a range of confounders likely to influence task performance. Overall, reduced PR responding by NL3s likely arose from a combination of their superior ability to withhold responding during prior training and a short PR training schedule. Meanwhile, increased PR responding by NL3s was attributable to their heightened degree of habitual responding. The NL3 mouse model therefore likely best represents autistic individuals with intact non-social motivation but altered behavioural updating. Finally, we discuss the benefits and limitations of using heterogenous experimental designs to probe behavioural phenotypes and offer some general recommendations for PR.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalConditioning, OperantMembrane ProteinsMotivationNerve Tissue ProteinsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCell Adhesion Molecules, NeuronalMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue Proteinsneuroligin 3atomoxetineautismcocainemethylphenidatemotivationneuroligin‐3R451Cstudy designtouchscreen

Identifiers

PMID40816723
PMCPMC12356647

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.