ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2025
Utilization of Rehabilitation Services After Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy Diagnosis: A Retrospective Cohort Assessment in the United States.
Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate utilization and timing of rehabilitation services for patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM).
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of US patients in the TriNetX dataset. Patients were defined by at least 2 IIM International Classification of Diseases, 9th/10th revision (ICD-9/10) codes between 1 and 12 months apart with at least 1 year of preceding data (from prior non-IIM ICD codes or Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes). Recurrent event modeling was performed from first IIM ICD code to the event of a CPT code for physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), and speech language pathology (SLP). Analysis was adjusted for the following potential confounders: age at first IIM ICD code, sex, IIM diagnosis subtype, stroke, hospitalization, orthopedic procedure, hip fracture, and glucocorticoid use.
resultsIn total, 22,434 patients with IIM and available data were identified, of whom 29.4% were male. After the first IIM ICD code, 20.1%, 5.3%, and 3.7% of patients had at least 1 PT, OT, and/or SLP evaluation, respectively, over an average of 10 years' follow-up. Mean time to rehabilitation services use was just under 2 years after first IIM code. Older age and prior use of the respective rehabilitation service were associated with higher rehabilitation service use across all categories. The dermatomyositis ICD group had significantly lower PT and OT use compared with the polymyositis ICD group.
conclusionRehabilitation utilization was infrequent overall, occurring nearly 2 years after the initial IIM ICD code. This may indicate barriers to appropriate integration of rehabilitation services for patients with IIM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.