Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817213›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2025

Microalgal biorefineries: a systematic review of technological trade-offs and innovation pathways.

Yucong Geng, Alishba Shaukat, Wania Azhar, Qurat-Ul-Ain Raza, Ayesha Tahir, Muhammad Zain Ul Abideen, Muhammad Abu Bakar Zia, Muhammad Amjad Bashir, Abdur Rehim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yucong GengSichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Land Utilization, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, 611130, People's Republic of China.
Alishba ShaukatDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
Wania AzharDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
Qurat-Ul-Ain RazaDepartment of Biological and Environmental Science, Emerson University, Multan, 60000, Pakistan.
Ayesha TahirDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zain Ul AbideenDepartment of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Abu Bakar ZiaLand Information and Management System-Center of Excellence (LIMS-COE), Green Pakistan Initiative, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Amjad BashirSichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Monitoring and Evaluation of Rural Land Utilization, Chengdu Normal University, Chengdu, 611130, People's Republic of China. amjad.bashir941@gmail.com.
Abdur RehimDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan. abdur.rehim@bzu.edu.pk.

Funding

Chengdu Normal University 2024XJCXXSY3Ministry of Education, China S202514389095; 202514389038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review critically examines the entire value chain of microalgal biorefineries, with the central aim of elucidating the key technological, economic, and environmental enablers and barriers that govern their transition from pilot-scale demonstrations to commercially viable, circular-economy applications. A systematic literature search was conducted across five major scientific databases using predefined Boolean strings: "algal biorefineries," "microalgae biofuel," "techno-economic analysis," "life-cycle assessment," and "bioproduct recovery." Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies and authoritative policy documents published between January 2007 and March 2025 that provided empirical data on upstream cultivation, midstream processing, and downstream conversion, as well as techno-economic assessments (TEA) and life-cycle analyses (LCA). Exclusion criteria included non-English commentaries, purely theoretical models without experimental validation, and studies that focused exclusively on single-product streams. Unlike previous reviews that address isolated segments of the algal biorefinery pipeline, this work delivers a novel, integrative framework that synthesizes recent advances across cultivation modes, genetic and metabolic engineering, AI-enabled optimization, and IoT-driven monitoring. This review critically evaluates the trade-offs between CAPEX and OPEX, energy penalties associated with harvesting and drying, and inconsistencies in LCA to identify, where performance improvements yield the most significant economic and environmental returns. Finally, this review proposes a targeted research roadmap, spanning multivariate strain engineering, hybrid cultivation architectures, low-energy harvesting technologies, cascade-compatible fractionation platforms, standardized LCA/TEA protocols, and supportive policy mechanisms, that charts a clear path toward overcoming current bottlenecks. This comprehensive, evidence-based synthesis aims to inform both academic research and industrial strategy, thereby advancing the field of sustainable algal biorefineries.

Indexed as

Algal biorefineriesLife-cycle analysisMicroalgae biofuelPhotobioreactorTechno-economic

Identifiers

PMID40817213
PMCPMC12357411

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.