ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Development and multi-cohort validation of a machine learning-based simplified frailty assessment tool for clinical risk prediction.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction of frailty in community older adults based on machine learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Frailty index deficit interchangeability: an empirical test using random survival forests in adults with cardiovascular disease.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- PhenoAge acceleration, serum tryptophan, and frailty in socially engaged actively aging elderly men.iScience · 2026Article
- Unveiling state-specific neural dynamics in migraine with and without depressive symptom: a hidden Markov model and interpretable machine learning approach.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- A Cross-Ethnicity Validated Machine Learning Model for the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Individuals over 50 Years Old.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A risk prediction model for medication safety: assessing cardiopulmonary adverse outcomes in 11,252 patients treated with ulinastatin.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the non-linear synergistic effects of smoking and aging on cataract-AMD comorbidity: an explainable artificial intelligence approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Translating the effect of dual lipid reduction with PCSK9 inhibitors on a mechanical vascular instrumental biomarker in familial hypercholesterolemia subjects.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Observational
- Development of a machine learning-based predictive model for osteoporosis risk and its application in clinical decision support.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Digital Technologies Supporting Active Ageing: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Trends and Thematic Structures.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrailty significantly impacts health outcomes in aging populations, yet its routine assessment remains challenging due to the complexity and time-consuming nature of existing tools. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically feasible, machine learning-based frailty assessment tool that balances predictive accuracy with implementation simplicity in real-world clinical settings.
methodsWe conducted a multi-cohort study leveraging data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, n = 3,480), China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, n = 16,792), China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS, n = 6,035), and Sun Yat-sen University Third Affiliated Hospital CKD cohort (SYSU3 CKD, n = 2,264). Through systematic application of five complementary feature selection algorithms to 75 potential variables, followed by comparative evaluation of 12 machine learning approaches, we developed a parsimonious assessment tool for predicting frailty diagnosis, chronic kidney disease progression, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.
resultsOur analysis identified a minimal set of just eight readily available clinical parameters— age, sex, body mass index (BMI), pulse pressure, creatinine, hemoglobin, and preparing meals difficulty and lifting/carrying difficulty—that demonstrated robust predictive power. The extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm exhibited superior performance across training (AUC 0.963, 95% CI: 0.951–0.975), internal validation (AUC 0.940, 95% CI: 0.924–0.956), and external validation (AUC 0.850, 95% CI: 0.832–0.868) datasets. This model significantly outperformed traditional frailty indices in predicting CKD progression (AUC 0.916 vs. 0.701, p < 0.001), cardiovascular events (AUC 0.789 vs. 0.708, p < 0.001), and mortality (time-dependent AUC 0.767 − 0.702 vs. 0.690 − 0.627, p < 0.001). SHAP analysis provided transparent insights into model predictions, facilitating clinical interpretation.
conclusionOur simplified frailty assessment tool demonstrates robust performance across multiple health outcomes while minimizing measurement burden. The model’s superior predictive capabilities for CKD progression, cardiovascular events, and mortality underscore its potential utility for risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.