ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychological and physiological differences related to supportive living situations amongst individuals with physical disabilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The caregiver-patient dynamic is a complex relationship. While caregivers' potential psychological and physical burdens have received much attention, few studies have focused on the patient's perspective. This study investigated how the presence of a caregiver affects perceived stress, mental health and metabolic function in individuals with physical disabilities (PDis). The study included individuals with a PDis living with a full-time caregiver and those with a PDis living alone. The severity of perceived stress, the state of mental health, and the amount of social support were assessed using standardized questionnaires. Urine samples were collected and analyzed using a proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-based metabolomics approach to investigate if different living situations affect biochemical pathways. Although there were no statistically significant differences in stress outcomes or mental health between the two groups, metabolomic analysis revealed a significant impact of the living situation on metabolic pathways, including histidine metabolism and alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism. Aspartic acid levels positively correlated with perceived stress and depressive symptoms in the Caregiver Group, while inosine positively correlated with stress in the Alone Group. This study highlights the unique psychological and metabolic profiles associated with a PDis based on living arrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.