Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40817424›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Predicting the quality of digital mammography from the perspective of detectability of microcalcifications: A Radiomics approach.

Lucas E Soares, Lucas R Borges, Renato F Caron, Denise Y Nersissian, Marcelo A C Vieira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas E SoaresDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Lucas R BorgesReal-Time Tomography LLC, Villanova, USA.
Renato F CaronBarretos Cancer Hospital, Pio XII Foundation, Barretos, Brazil.
Denise Y NersissianDepartment of Nuclear Physics, Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo A C VieiraDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) 001Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) 2021/12673-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage quality in mammography is influenced by several technical factors, including radiation dose, exposure parameters, and detector type. Although observer studies are essential for assessing image quality and lesion detectability, they are complex, time-consuming, and costly, making routine implementation challenging. Traditional objective metrics for quality assessment have limited applicability in medical imaging and often rely on a ground-truth reference, which is typically unavailable in clinical scenarios. Therefore, methods that assess image quality directly from clinical images, particularly when linked to diagnostic performance, are highly desirable. PURPOSE: To propose a method based on radiomic features and machine learning to predict the quality of clinical mammography images in terms of microcalcification detectability, without relying on routine observer studies.

methodsA total of 1125 radiomic features were extracted from clinical mammography images acquired using two different digital breast imaging systems. Feature selection was performed to reduce dimensionality and retain the most informative attributes. These were used to train a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) regression model to estimate detectability values as defined by a model observer (MO). To increase the variability of the data and evaluate model robustness, two types of image degradation were synthetically applied to the dataset, one associated with noise and the other with blurring. The trained model was assessed using quantitative and statistical analyses, focusing on the correlation between predicted and reference detectability scores.

resultsThe proposed MLP regression model showed a strong correlation with the detectability values provided by the MO. Even with the introduction of degradations, the model maintained high predictive accuracy, achieving a correlation coefficient greater than 0.9.

conclusionsThe combination of radiomic features and a machine learning regression model demonstrated the ability to account for variations in acquisition systems and simulated image degradations. This approach offers a promising tool for image quality assessment in clinical mammography, particularly in tasks involving microcalcification detection, without the need for labor-intensive observer studies.

Indexed as

CalcinosisImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningQuality ControlRadiomicsdigital mammographyimage quality assessmentmachine learningmodel observerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40817424
PMCPMC12356991

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.