ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2025
Clinical Judgement, Treatment Decisions and Frailty Management in Older Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Experiences of Radiation Therapy Staff.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTreatment of older cancer patients can be complex due to frailty that comes with age, and the benefits of radiation therapy for frail older patients are unclear. Radiation therapy staff play a crucial role in identifying and monitoring frailty and tailoring treatment. Research on radiation therapy in frail older patients is limited, and frailty assessments are not widely used in routine care. Understanding staff experiences with clinical judgement and frailty assessment is important for effective treatment. This study explored the radiation therapy staff's experiences of clinical judgement, treatment decision-making, and managing frail older cancer patients.
methodsThe study has an inductive design in which 12 specialist oncology nurses and four clinical oncologists working with cancer patients at four radiation therapy units across four counties in Sweden were interviewed. In total, 16 participants were interviewed for the study. Data were collected in semi-structured individual interviews and were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThree themes were identified from the interview analysis: Putting the patient first, Care with integrity and humanity and Receiving support in treatment decisions, along with nine sub-themes. None of the participants was using any structured instrument for assessing frailty.
conclusionsRadiation therapy staff face significant and complex challenges when treating frail older cancer patients, which can lead to feelings of doubt and powerlessness. Awareness and use of structured frailty assessment are limited. Integrating structured frailty assessment could address the complex challenges experienced by staff by improving decision-making, communication, and patient outcomes, contributing to more ethical and person-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.