Evidence mapPaperPMID 40817825Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

"Can't Use Old Keys to Open New Doors": Relational Desistance Mechanisms Within Community Violence Interventions.

Peter Simonsson, Caterina Gouvis-Roman, Shadd Maruna, Peter Twigg

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter SimonssonTemple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-9067
Caterina Gouvis-RomanTemple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shadd MarunaLiverpool University, UK.
Peter TwiggTemple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community Violence Intervention (CVI) programs show promising results in reducing health disparities such as firearm injury and violence. However, the process by which these programs bring about positive change is less well due to program variations and the focus of existing studies. Hence, program components and strategies used in day-to-day community violence intervention work are less clear. To address this gap, this study used in-depth interview data focused on understanding the early engagement of participants in an east coast United States community violence intervention program (n = 32). Questions focused on the process by which credible messengers as outreach workers motivate at-risk individuals to join the program, obtaining descriptions of the personal mentoring and cognitive change efforts driving desistance. Three key themes emerged: outreach workers use their own "lived experience" or self-narratives to build trust and motivate at-risk individuals to join and stick with programing; outreach workers and participants form a unique relationship through which participants are buoyed by belonging to a new "family"; and participants acquire new skills and prosocial peer networks that help them navigate away from the streets. Together, these processes support at-risk individuals through what might be best understood as a social movement as opposed to an individualistic process of "corrections" or reform.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsViolenceAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative Researchcommunity violence interventiondesistancelived experiencenarratives

Identifiers

PMID40817825
PMCPMC12357993

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.