ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
The quest for Parkinson's disease biomarkers: traditional and emerging multi-omics approaches.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteo-metabolomic integration identifies stage-specific candidate biomarkers for Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- A damage-aware NGS workflow for conservative species identification from ultra-degraded DNA.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Multi-omics approaches to parkinsonism: genomic, proteomic, and non-coding RNA perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Seed Amplification Assays for Parkinson's Disease: A Review of α-Synuclein Assays in Body Fluids and Tissues.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, leading to reduced dopamine levels and a wide range of motor and non-motor disorders contributing to disability and death. Unfortunately, there are no specific laboratory tests available for the early diagnosis of PD, and the cure is on hold. Given the heterogeneity of PD and overlapping symptoms with other disorders, one biomarker may not be sufficient for accurate diagnosis. Dopamine transporter imaging tests may be useful in diagnosis, but their utility is limited by factors such as availability, sensitivity, and resolution. Recent advances in testing, particularly those involving alpha-synuclein seed amplification, have shown promise. Given the heterogeneity of PD and overlapping symptoms with other disorders, one biomarker may not be sufficient for accurate diagnosis. Instead, a biomarker panel potentially incorporating multi-omics approaches will be needed. This panel should integrate various biomarkers derived from neuroimaging, oxidative stress, neuroprotection, and inflammation, tested from brain tissue, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood, urine, and saliva. Multi-omics approaches and utilizing the exosomes could be beneficial, as exosomes protect their cargo from extracellular degradation and play a role in paracrine signaling that may contribute to disease progression. Our review discusses the current landscape of potential biomarkers for PD and highlights recent developments in this field. The identification of specific biomarkers representing disease onset, progression, and risk factors for PD is essential. A biomarker panel that incorporates multi-omics approaches and integrates various biomarkers from different sources may be the key to unlocking effective PD diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40817993What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.