Evidence mapPaperPMID 40818249Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2025

Diffuse neuropsychiatric lupus: Clinical evidence, immune-mediated mechanisms, and therapeutic insights.

Rachel Weissman-Tsukamoto, Kaitlin R Carroll, Betty Diamond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel Weissman-TsukamotoInstitute of Molecular Medicine, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Kaitlin R CarrollInstitute of Molecular Medicine, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA.
Betty DiamondInstitute of Molecular Medicine, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA. Electronic address: bdiamond@northwell.edu.

Funding

The Monoclonal Antibody and Reagent CoreP01AI073693 · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · 2025 to 2025
$2.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI073693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) occur in more than half of patients with SLE, with symptoms including fatigue, anxiety, depression, pain, psychosis, and cognitive dysfunction. These symptoms are often present at the time of diagnosis of SLE and can be insidious. Patients consider these to be among their most debilitating symptoms which most diminish their quality of life, but recognition and attribution of these frequently non-acute symptoms can be difficult, resulting in underassessment, underdiagnosis, and poor understanding of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and how to treat them. In this review, we highlight findings from neuroimaging studies which have been critical in proving the existence of structural and functional brain alterations that associate with symptomatology, and pathophysiological findings from animal models of diffuse NPSLE, focusing principally on blood brain barrier injury and brain-reactive autoantibodies. Most importantly, we demonstrate that mechanistic progress can be made with respect to these manifestations of NPSLE and that this progress leads to therapeutic strategies which can be tested in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Lupus Vasculitis, Central Nervous SystemAnimalsAutoantibodiesBlood-Brain BarrierBrainDisease Models, AnimalHumansQuality of LifeAutoantibodiesAutoantibodiesBlood brain barrierCognitive dysfunctionFatigueMood disordersNPSLESLE

Identifiers

PMID40818249
PMCPMC13251895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.