ArticleOpen heart2025
Differences in the management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among physicians from Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: an international survey.
Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) poses global diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with potential regional differences in clinical practice that remain underexplored. This study aimed to map physician-reported HFpEF diagnostic and management practices across Europe and the Middle East-North Africa (MENA) region to identify similarities, differences and opportunities for improved care.
methodsAn independent, academically developed survey consisting of 29 questions was designed through expert collaboration to capture detailed information on physician demographics, diagnostic strategies, screening practices, pathophysiological understanding and treatment approaches for HFpEF. The survey was validated by heart failure specialists to ensure relevance and accuracy and distributed widely through professional societies, email and social media channels to reach cardiologists, general practitioners and other physicians involved in heart failure care across Europe and MENA.
resultsA total of 723 physicians participated (77 from MENA, 646 from Europe). The proportion of heart failure specialists was higher in Europe (26%) than in MENA (12%, p<0.001), while general cardiologists comprised a larger share in MENA (81% vs 59%, p<0.001). Natriuretic peptide testing use was lower in MENA (82%) compared with Europe (92%, p=0.023). Pharmacotherapy preferences showed both regional similarities and differences, with SGLT2 inhibitors being the most preferred drug of choice universally. In contrast, there was a higher ranking of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in Europe (p=0.007) and greater reported use of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors in MENA (p=0.03).
conclusionThis large international survey offers a descriptive mapping of HFpEF care practices across Europe and MENA, revealing overall guideline alignment but also regional differences in diagnostic test use and pharmacotherapy preferences. These findings underscore the need for targeted education, improved diagnostic and therapeutic access and tailored guideline implementation to ensure equitable, evidence-based HFpEF management across diverse healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.