ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing the effect of pre-anesthesia clonidine and tranexamic acid on intraoperative bleeding volume in rhinoplasty: a machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An ensemble model based on transfer learning for the early detection of Alzheimer's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effectively managing intraoperative blood loss during surgery is crucial, as it significantly impacts patient outcomes and the surgeon's reputation. This importance is amplified in rhinoplasty, where minimizing bleeding is vital for optimal results. Consequently, this research investigates how various preoperative medications, such as clonidine and tranexamic acid (TXA), affect blood loss during rhinoplasty, with an emphasis on enhancing surgical efficiency and patient safety. This retrospective cross-sectional study examined data from 120 patients who underwent rhinoplasty from 2019 to 2022. The data were preprocessed and analyzed using various regression models, including Linear regression, random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting, Ridge, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), to forecast blood loss associated with the use of clonidine and TXA. The findings were then compared to determine the most effective medication and the best predictive model. The results revealed that the Linear and Ridge regression algorithms outperformed all other models based on three evaluation metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and R-squared. The estimated blood loss during rhinoplasty was 112 mL with clonidine, 132 mL with TXA, and 157 mL without any medication. This study highlights the significance of preoperative medications in controlling blood loss during rhinoplasty. The findings indicate that regression models can accurately predict blood loss, with clonidine demonstrating a significant impact on reducing hemorrhage. This reduction enhances the surgeon's visibility and may contribute to a shorter duration of the surgical procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.