ArticleIET systems biology
Machine Learning-Based Integration of Single-Cell and Bulk Transcriptome Reveals Coagulation Signature and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a Six Sigma-Based Dynamic Quality Control Strategy for Hematology Analysis: A Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Integration of Single-Cell and Bulk Transcriptome Reveals Coagulation Signature and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary liver cancer ranks as the third most lethal cancer globally, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent pathologic type. The liver plays a crucial role in maintaining normal coagulation function by synthesising, regulating and clearing coagulation factors and other bioactive substances involved in coagulation. Although several previous studies have proposed coagulation-associated prognostic models in HCC, the mechanisms at the single-cell level are not fully elucidated. In this study, the coagulation subtypes and their heterogeneity of HCC malignant cells were identified based on the coagulation-related genes collected from KEGG and GO databases. Through machine learning algorithms, we defined a coagulation gene signature at the single-cell level, based on which a coagulation-associated risk score (CARS) model was constructed in the TCGA-LIHC cohort. Integrating clinicopathological information and the CARS, a nomogram model was further developed for individualised prognostic assessment. Additionally, the mechanisms of prognostic differences among patients with divergent coagulation-associated risks were dissected through tumour signalling pathways, cellular communication and pseudotime trajectory analysis, while exploring the potential application of this risk assessment system in HCC treatment. In conclusion, the established CARS system accurately predicts prognosis, providing an important theoretical basis for precision treatment of HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.