ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Mutual information-based best linear unbiased prediction for enhanced genomic prediction accuracy.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research progress on genomic selection breeding technology for crops.Protoplasma · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of genomic prediction (GP) in breeding programs has increased with the advancement of high-throughput sequencing. However, current methods face limitations: 1) genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) assumes that all markers contribute equally to the genetic variance, which can limit accuracy for traits influenced by a few major genes; 2) Bayesian methods, although more flexible, often require intensive computation. To address these challenges, we present mutual information-based best linear unbiased prediction (MIBLUP), a novel framework that integrates marker selection and weighted genomic relationship matrices (GRM). MIBLUP employs a two-step approach: 1) using minimum redundancy maximum relevance and cross-validation to select informative markers as covariates and 2) constructing a mutual information-weighted GRM to prioritize markers with stronger trait associations. In simulations involving 7 scenarios with three heritability levels (0.2, 0.5, and 0.8), MIBLUP achieved up to 0.091 higher accuracy than GBLUP in four scenarios, with an average improvement of 0.056 across all scenarios. When evaluated on five real datasets (cattle, pig, loblolly pine, Duroc pig, and chicken), MIBLUP outperformed other methods such as GBLUP, Bayes R, BSLMM, LDAK-Bayes R, LDAK-Bolt, SLEMM, KAML, and BLUP|GA in overall prediction accuracy. Computationally, MIBLUP demonstrated substantially higher efficiency in both speed and memory usage compared with Bayesian methods such as Bayes R, making it more suitable for large-scale genomic datasets. Overall, MIBLUP shows promise as a reliable tool for enhancing GP performance in animal and plant breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.