ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026
Using artificial intelligence as a technological tool in gynecologic and obstetric health: A narrative literature review.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using artificial intelligence as a technological tool in gynecologic and obstetric health: A narrative literature review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maternal mortality remains a critical global public health issue, particularly in low- and middle-income settings where failures in surveillance, early diagnosis, and clinical decision making compromise obstetric care. In this context, the present study aimed to critically review the scientific literature on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in gynecologic and obstetric health, focusing on the prevention of avoidable deaths and severe maternal events. This is a narrative literature review with a qualitative and exploratory-interpretative approach, conducted between May and June 2025 in relevant electronic databases, following structured axes for narrative reviews and well-defined eligibility criteria. A total of 403 records were identified, of which 17 studies met the criteria and were included in the analysis, supported by the Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires software. The results showed that AI has been used to predict obstetric risks such as pre-eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm birth through machine learning algorithms, neural networks and predictive models based on electronic health records and laboratory tests. Tools such as clinical decision support systems, portable devices, and mobile applications have also optimized care, particularly in regions with limited infrastructure. However, challenges remain concerning the validation of algorithms across diverse populations, the inclusion of sociodemographic variables, and ethical considerations. In conclusion, AI is a promising technology in obstetric care, with the potential to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, its implementation requires ethical guidelines, adequate professional training, and inclusive public policies that promote digital equity in maternal and child healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.