ArticleHaematologica2026
Strategies for identifying
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunophenotypic, Cytogenetic, and Molecular Characterization of NUP98-Rearranged Pediatric Myeloid Neoplasms.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2026Article
- Pathologies at the gateway: exploring the link between nucleoporins and inherited diseases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleoporin 98 rearrangements (NUP98r) are recurrent in myeloid neoplasms and are subtype-defining for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the World Health Organization Classification 5th edition (WHO5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC). Identification of NUP98r is essential given the frequency of treatment resistance and possibility of sensitivity to targeted therapies. However, NUP98r is often cryptic on karyotype and has over 40 described partners. Therefore, it is underdiagnosed in the absence of dedicated testing that is not always routine practice, e.g., RNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS), NUP98 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization, or real-time-quantitative polymerase chain reaction for specific NUP98 fusions. Historically, AML with NUP98r has received the most attention in pediatric AML, where its incidence is highest, but has been increasingly characterized in adult AML. By contrast, the incidence and behavior of NUP98 fusions in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is less understood and based predominantly on case reports. In this study, we describe our adult institutional experience with a clinically validated anchored multiplex PCR RNA-based targeted NGS assay, explore strategies for rational use of specific testing for NUP98r including a proof-of-principle based on WT1 and FLT3- ITD mutational status, and integrate our results with a review of the literature. In total, we identified 3 MDS and 15 AML patients with NUP98r as the genetic driver, including two novel fusion partners (FGF14 and LAMC3), thus highlighting the utility of NGS testing to detect NUP98 fusions. Recognition of NUP98r in myeloid neoplasms is crucial for accurate diagnosis and prognosis, with significant implications for therapy or enrollment in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.