ArticleBMJ public health2025
Factors influencing non-communicable disease policy process in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractIntroduction: Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have been the leading global cause of death for two decades, with a disproportionate impact on low- and middle-income countries. Despite the development of technical packages such as the WHO Best Buys, the adoption and implementation of NCD policies pose significant challenges. This scoping review explores the factors influencing the NCD policy process, including agenda setting, formulation, adoption, implementation and evaluation stages. Methods: This scoping review followed the methodological framework provided by Levac Results: The search yielded 7538 records, after screening for title, abstract and full text, 35 articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. Six different types of policy actors were identified, namely, (i) government, (ii) private sector, (iii) advocates, (iv) experts, (v) international partners, (vi) experts and (vii) general public. Policy actors used lobbying tactics to influence how the policy process was executed; however, it was unclear how the process of influence took place. We identified six barriers of the NCD policy process: (i) limited access to resources, (ii) limited reliable local data, (iii) role of the government, (iv) limited multisectoral collaboration, (v) limited infrastructure, (vi) knowledge and belief. Six facilitators of the NCD policy process were identified: (i) multisectoral approach, (ii) sufficient capacity and financial resources, (iii) access to reliable local evidence, (iv) strong advocacy, (v) existing infrastructures, and (vi) political will were reported. Conclusion: Findings from this review revealed a knowledge gap in understanding of the tactics used by actors to influence the policy process and the absence of evidence related to the evaluation of NCD policies in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.