Evidence mapPaperPMID 40821043Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025

Serum biomarkers and clinicopathologic postoperative prognostic factors for in endometrial cancer patients.

Huiqiao Gao, Meizhu Xiao, Ying Feng, Jianxin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Huiqiao GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Beijing 100020, China.
Meizhu XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Beijing 100020, China.
Ying FengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Beijing 100020, China.
Jianxin ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Beijing 100020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the factors influencing the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients and assess their quality of life.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted involving 190 patients with EC who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University between January 2008 and December 2018. Clinical and pathologic data were collected, and all patients received appropriate follow-up. Univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the factors related to EC prognosis and independent predictors of outcome. Additionally, the predictive performance of the serum biomarkers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and CA199 for patient prognosis were evaluated.

resultsAll 190 EC patients had complete clinical, pathologic, and follow-up data. The median survival time was 88.95 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 94.4%. Univariate analysis showed that older age, postmenopausal status, higher FIGO stage, deeper myometrial invasion, poorer tissue differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and receipt of postoperative chemotherapy and combined radiotherapy were significantly associated with worse prognosis (P<0.05). The sensitivities of CEA, CA125, and CA199 for predicting adverse prognosis were 86.7%, 97.6%, and 82.4%, respectively; specificities were 72.0%, 68.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.681, 0.867, and 0.853, respectively.

conclusionPostoperative prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer is influenced by multiple clinical and pathological factors. Serological markers CEA, CA125, and CA199 demonstrated favorable predictive value.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerinfluencing factorsprognosissurgerysurvival treatment

Identifiers

PMID40821043
PMCPMC12351586

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.