ArticlePeerJ2025
Identification of hub genes and prediction of the ceRNA network in adult sepsis.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circular RNAs in sepsis-induced acute lung injury: emerging mechanisms and therapeutic potential.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Glioblastoma Prognosis and Therapeutic Response Predicted by a Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Risk Score.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis refers to a dysregulated host immune response to infection. It carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality, and its pathogenesis has yet to be fully elucidated. The main aim of this study was to identify prognostic hub genes for sepsis and to predict a competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network that regulates the hub genes. Methods: Six transcriptome datasets from the peripheral blood of septic patients were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The robust rank aggregation (RRA) method was used to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across these datasets. A comprehensive bioinformatics investigation was conducted, encompassing Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses using the "clusterProfiler" package in R, as well as gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to further elucidate the biological functions and pathways associated with the DEGs. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify a module significantly associated with sepsis. Integration of this module with protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis facilitated the identification of five hub genes. These hub genes were subsequently validated using an independent dataset and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of peripheral blood samples from septic patients. The prognostic values of these hub genes were assessed Results: RRA analysis identified 164 DEGs across six training cohorts. Bioinformatics analyses revealed concurrent hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in sepsis patients. Five hub genes were identified Conclusion: This study identified four hub genes (CLEC4D, GPR84, S100A12, and HK3) with significant prognostic value in sepsis and predicted a ceRNA network (NEAT1-hsa-miR-495-3p-ELF1) regulating their expression. The integrated analysis reconfirmed the concurrent presence of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in hospitalized sepsis patients. These findings enhance the understanding of sepsis pathogenesis and identify potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.