SynthesisFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Clinical, neurophysiological and neurochemical effects of non-invasive electrical brain stimulation in fibromyalgia syndrome-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is linked to central sensitization and neuroplastic alterations that contribute to chronic pain, fatigue, cognitive, sleep, and affective disturbances. Conventional treatments offer limited benefit. Non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), particularly transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), may modulate brain function and relieve symptoms, but findings remain inconsistent. Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyze the effects of tES on clinical, neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and neurochemical outcomes in FMS. Methods: Seven databases were searched for studies published between April 2013 and April 2023. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials, cross-over, one-arm, and case studies involving adult FMS patients. Data extraction followed Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and used RevMan 6.6.0. Results: Anodal tDCS produced short- to mid-term reductions in pain and mood symptoms, especially when applied over M1 or DLPFC. Longer interventions and repeated sessions enhanced effects, though protocol heterogeneity limited comparability. Both subjective (VAS, NRS) and objective (QST) measures confirmed pain reduction. Cognitive improvements were inconsistent, and quality of life effects were limited. Neurophysiological and neurochemical changes suggested possible mechanisms, though findings varied. Study quality was mixed, with small sample sizes and methodological inconsistencies. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant but small effects on pain (Hedges' Conclusions: Anodal tDCS may offer short-term relief of pain and mood symptoms in FMS, potentially through modulation of cortical excitability and neuroplasticity. However, due to variability in findings and methodological limitations, its clinical relevance remains unclear. Future trials should use standardized protocols, assess long-term effects, and include clinically meaningful outcome measures. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023412332, PROSPERO CRD42023412332.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.