SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Meta-analysis of
Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of gut microbiota in cancer modulation: molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutic strategies.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- BeyondMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Oral pathogens meet the gut microbiome: new mechanistic insights on systemic disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using publicly available 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenomic datasets. Microbiome composition differences were assessed using differential abundance analysis, alpha- and beta-diversity metrics, and principal component analysis (PCA). Random forest models were employed to predict the clinical outcomes based on microbiome and clinical data. Hyperparameter tuning and cross-validation were applied to ensure model robustness. Results: The analysis revealed significant microbial shifts associated with Discussion: This study highlights the critical role of GM dysbiosis in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.