ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
The dual effects of nanomaterials on sperm and seminal fluid oxidative stress.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reactive Oxygen Species-Induced Damage in Cryopreserved Bovine Sperm: Mitigation Strategies.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Improvement of cryopreserved rooster semen quality by combined application of DMF and ZnO NPs.Poultry science · 2026Article
- The Effects of Graphene Oxide Nanoparticles on the Cryopreservation of Angora Buck Sperm.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles in chemical castration of male Wistar rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Is Emerging Nanomedicine a Friend or Foe to Germ Cells?International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials, due to their unique physicochemical properties, have found widespread applications in biomedical, energy, and environmental fields. Currently, their effects on the male reproductive system are also under investigation. Oxidative stress, a pathological condition resulting from an imbalance between the generation and clearance of reactive oxygen species (ROS), is a critical mechanism affecting male reproductive function. Therefore, this review focuses on the regulatory mechanisms of various nanomaterials on semen oxidative stress, synthesizing literature data and evaluating their effects and molecular underpinnings. Previous studies indicate that nanomaterials exhibit dual effects: some materials (e.g. selenium, cerium dioxide nanoparticles) mimic the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), or enhance endogenous antioxidant systems such as glutathione peroxidase (GPx), significantly reducing ROS levels and improving sperm motility, membrane integrity, and DNA stability. Conversely, other materials (e.g., silver nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles) release surface metal ions, activate inflammatory pathways, or impair mitochondrial function, triggering Fenton reactions and excessive ROS accumulation, leading to lipid peroxidation, DNA fragmentation, and reproductive cell apoptosis. Furthermore, the effects of nanomaterials are influenced by their physicochemical characteristics (e.g., size, modification), exposure dose, administration route, and research models. Surface functionalization (e.g., antioxidant loading, polymer coating) can effectively modulate their outcomes. This review emphasizes the need for a careful balance between the antioxidant potential and pro-oxidant risks of nanomaterials in reproductive medicine. Future studies should focus on multi-scale toxicity assessments, standardized model development, and optimized targeted delivery strategies to promote the sustainable application of nanomaterials in male infertility treatment and sperm preservation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.