ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Polyacrylamide hydrogel injections in knee osteoarthritis: A PROMs-based 24 month cohort study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smoking quitting promotes neuromuscular and cartilage recovery in knee osteoarthritis.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Intra-Articular Polyacrylamide Hydrogel and the Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid/Chondroitin Sulfate Combination in Treating Advanced-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The intra-articular polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) injection known to be safe and efficacious in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. However, literature surrounding which patients would incur most benefit from PAAG is limited. We aim to identify patient factors that would allow PAAG to provide the most clinical benefit in knee OA patient. Methods: Knee OA patients were identified in clinics in Lincoln and London to engage in prospective cohort study. Patient factors were recorded and a course of PAAG was administered. Outcomes were Visual Analogue Score (VAS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Lysholm scores taken from baseline till 24 months. Patients were further grouped based on number of scores that have reached Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify influence of patient factors on outcome scores and MCID, need for TKR(total knee replacement), and development of complications. Results: 314 knees (269 patients) with OA were treated with PAAG and followed up over 2 years. The patient factors that increased the odds of reaching MCID in all 3 scores by 24 months include being older (Exp B = 1·015, p = 0·041), a lower knee OA grade (Exp B = 0·576, p = 0·001), not having diabetes (Exp B = 2·204, p = 0·027), and having bilateral rather than unilateral knee OA (Exp B = 1·988, p = 0·021). 49 patients required TKR over the 2 years, with patients having higher-grade knee OA (b = 0·97, p < 0·001) more likely to have TKR. 155/314 knees developed complications. Conclusions: PAAG provided improvement in knee OA symptoms over 24 months, in older, non-diabetic patients with lower KL grades over 24 months. The absence of a control group and limited outcome measures should be considered. Further studies are warranted to validate efficacy, refine patient selection, and evaluate long-term impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.