SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Integrative review of artificial intelligence applications in nursing: education, clinical practice, workload management, and professional perceptions.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nurses' Experiences Using AI in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.JMIR nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Stakeholder experience with artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric study of satisfaction, trust, acceptance, and patient engagement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- A Meta-synthesis of nursing students' experiences with generative artificial intelligence-assisted learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a scoping review of reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in nursing: a systematic review of attitudes, literacy, readiness, and adoption intentions among nursing students and practicing nurses.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Navigating AI governance for oncology nursing: Existing models, implications, and a Call for nurse-led oversight in Asia Pacific health systems.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- When Care Becomes Digital: Shared Experiences in Psychiatric Nursing-A Phenomenological Study.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Literacy, Critical Thinking Disposition, and Clinical Competence Among Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Article
- Using the CFIR 2.0 Framework to Assess the Implementation of GARDE: A Population Health Management Tool for Hereditary Cancer Risk.Research square · 2026Article
- Personal mastery and its predictors among pediatric nurses: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Real-time interaction with artificial intelligence and its association with learning experience and academic performance among undergraduate nursing students in Peshawar: an analytical cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Health Professional Students' Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence During Clinical Placements: Cross-Sectional Online Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Understanding undergraduate nursing students' learning journeys with artificial intelligence: a journey mapping study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Digital Skills and Readiness of Greek Nurses for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Clinical Nursing Practice.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- AI-powered tools in family medicine: Bridging technology and practice.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Beyond the Bedside in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI): Preserving the Humanistic Core of Nursing.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the nursing profession, presenting significant opportunities and challenges. Despite its promising potential in enhancing nursing education, clinical practice, and operational efficiency, critical barriers related to ethics, workforce adaptation, and humanistic care persist. Aim: This integrative review systematically evaluates the integration of AI in nursing practice, with a specific focus on nursing education, clinical care, workload management, and professional perceptions. Methods: Guided by PRISMA 2020 and the SPIDER framework, a thematic synthesis was conducted. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and the risk of bias evaluated through ROBINS-I. Results: This review encompassed 25 studies, from which six overarching themes emerged. Education and training: AI-powered simulations and content-creation platforms enriched nursing curricula by presenting realistic clinical scenarios, which consistently yielded deeper student engagement, enhanced case-management performance, and higher satisfaction scores. Learners also reported an increased cognitive load and heightened stress levels when navigating these more complex, AI-driven activities. Clinical decision support and monitoring: AI-enabled alert algorithms and wearable sensors enabled nurses to detect subtle signs of patient deterioration and fever significantly earlier than conventional methods, supporting timelier clinical interventions. Qualitative feedback from critical-care staff underscores that these automated insights must be balanced with professional judgment to avoid overreliance. Rehabilitation and postoperative care: In neurosurgical, gynecological, and orthopaedic settings, AI-guided imaging tools and personalized follow-up pathways were linked to smoother recovery trajectories, streamlined follow-up processes and richer patient feedback, and exceptionally high patient satisfaction. Nurses noted that these technologies enhanced the precision of assessments without wholly replacing the need for human touch. Workload and workflow management: AI systems that automated routine follow-up tasks and generated predictive workload models freed nurses from repetitive, non-clinical duties and offered data-driven insights to inform staffing decisions. These efficiencies allowed nursing teams to devote more time to direct patient care and were associated with reductions in burnout and improved workplace morale. Nursing perceptions: Across practice settings, nursing students and practicing nurses broadly welcomed AI's ability to streamline workflows and support decision-making, recognizing its potential to elevate patient care and professional practice. Ethical implications: Simultaneously, nurses voiced significant ethical concerns-chiefly around safeguarding patient data privacy, mitigating algorithmic bias, and preserving the compassionate, human-centered essence of nursing in an increasingly automated environment. Framework and recommendations: The Nursing AI Integration Roadmap (NAIIR) was developed, emphasizing transformational education, advanced clinical integration, ethical governance, robust organizational infrastructure, participatory design, and rigorous economic evaluation. This framework offers a structured, ethically informed, and user-centric approach, advocating for AI as complementary to human expertise. Conclusion: Successfully integrating AI into nursing requires comprehensive strategic planning that addresses educational, clinical, ethical, organizational, participatory, and economic dimensions, reinforcing the core humanistic values of nursing. Of the 25 included studies, 21 were judged at moderate risk of bias; despite this limitation, evidence suggests improvements in critical thinking, learner engagement, and clinical satisfaction across diverse educational and practice settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.