Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823285›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025

The potential for dementia prevention in Brazil: a population attributable fraction calculation for 14 modifiable risk factors.

Claudia K Suemoto, Wyllians V Borelli, Ismael L Calandri, Laiss Bertola, Raphael M Castilhos, Paulo Caramelli, Ricardo Nitrini, Sonia M D Brucki, Jerson Laks, Naaheed Mukadam and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer's disease pathology in a diverse autopsy study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Stratifying dementia risk factors: A prediction model and hypothesis-driven analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claudia K SuemotoDivision of Geriatrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Wyllians V BorelliDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ismael L CalandriFleni Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laiss BertolaDivision of Geriatrics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Raphael M CastilhosCognitive and Behavioral Neurology Center, Neurology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Paulo CaramelliBehavioral and Cognitive Neurology Unit, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ricardo NitriniDepartment of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sonia M D BruckiDepartment of Neurology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jerson LaksDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Naaheed MukadamDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, UK.
Cleusa P FerriEscola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Psiquiatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Lancet Commission on dementia prevention, intervention, and care 2024 updated the list of modifiable risk factors to include 14 factors. The potential for dementia prevention seems to be greater in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) due to the higher prevalence of these factors. This study aims to provide the first LMIC figure for the potential for dementia prevention in Brazil attributed to 14 modifiable risk factors. Methods: Data was retrieved from 9949 participants aged 50 years or older from the nationally representative second wave of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil) conducted between 2019 and 2021. The prevalence of modifiable risk factors was estimated, and principal component analysis was used to account for factor communalities. Overall and individual population attributable fractions (PAF) were calculated using relative risks from the 2024 Lancet Commission report. Stratified analyses by sex, race, and Brazilian macro regions were performed to assess disparities in dementia risk. Findings: The overall PAF for the 14 modifiable risk factors was 59.5% (95% CI = 58.5-60.5). The three risk factors with the highest PAFs were less education (9.5%, 95% CI = 8.9-10.1), untreated visual loss (9.2%, 95% CI = 8.6-9.8), and midlife depression (6.3%, 95% CI = 5.8-6.8). The overall PAF was similar across race and region but was higher among women (61.1%, 95% CI = 59.9-62.4) compared to men (58.2%, 95% CI = 56.7-59.8). Interpretation: Almost 60% of dementia cases in Brazil could potentially be prevented by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors. Public health strategies could further reduce the dementia burden in Brazil. Funding: CKS, PC, and CPF received productivity fellowships from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). ELSI-Brazil was supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health: DECIT/SCTIE (Grants: 404965/2012-1 and TED 28/2017); COPID/DECIV/SAPS (Grants: 20836, 22566, 23700, 25560, 25552, and 27510).

Indexed as

BrazilDementiaPreventionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40823285
PMCPMC12355584

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.