ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025
Kratom use among ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado: Subjective drug effects, adverse reactions, and perceived benefits of use.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kava (Piper methysticum) consumption patterns and conceptualizations: results from an online survey.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
- Characteristics of adverse reactions to kratom and implementation of harm reduction strategies in a sample of ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Observational real-world analysis of dose-dependent effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Clinically characterizing adults who use kava or kratom: Substance use disorder assessment challenges for increasingly popular botanical products.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2025Article
- Active monitoring vs. spontaneous reporting of antineoplastic drug-related adverse drug reactions: evidence from the Chinese hospital pharmacovigilance system.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Kratom use is increasing in the US, yet data characterizing use patterns, risks, and benefits is limited. Additionally, there are few data on the acute subjective effects of kratom in humans, and no studies to-date have examined kratom use within US public consumption settings, which have become increasingly popular in recent years. Methods: Using field methods, we administered surveys to 102 ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in northern Colorado. Surveys assessed demographic information, kratom use patterns, perceived benefits, and adverse reactions. We also assessed subjective drug effects acutely after participants consumed kratom at the bars. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach. Results: Participants (mean age=22.34 years, 39.2 % women), reported frequent kratom use (73.4 % endorsed weekly use, 19.3 % endorsed daily use). Reported benefits included mental and physical health benefits, social enhancement, and substance use harm reduction. Adverse reactions primarily involved gastrointestinal issues, though acute psychological effects (e.g., anxiety), and withdrawal symptoms were also cited. Kratom use in a bar setting was associated with acute stimulation and mild euphoria, and minimal sedation. Conclusions: While most participants reported perceived benefits, the presence of adverse reactions highlight the need for more data on safety and risks of kratom use, particularly within public consumption spaces. Results also highlight the possible role of kratom in supporting substance use disorder recovery, with some ethnobotanical tea bars potentially functioning as recovery spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.