Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823326›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025

Kratom use among ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado: Subjective drug effects, adverse reactions, and perceived benefits of use.

Cianna J Piercey, Joseph Bunch, Joseph Cameron, Riley Ahern, Isabella Packwood, Carter Bruning, Devin Henry, Jesse Ruehrmund, Katelyn Weldon, Kirsten E Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cianna J PierceyDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Joseph BunchDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Joseph CameronDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Riley AhernSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Isabella PackwoodDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Carter BruningSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Devin HenryDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Jesse RuehrmundDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Katelyn WeldonDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Kirsten E SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Hollis C KarolyDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Funding

Exploring the Effects of Cannabinoids on Alcohol Consumption and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain AxisK23AA028238 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KAROLY, HOLLIS C · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
Real-world momentary assessment of kratom use and laboratory-based observed cessation accompanied by product assays: Toward an interdisciplinary characterization of kratom use and pharmacologyR00DA055571 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, KIRSTEN · 2024 to 2025
$498k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA028238NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA055571
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Kratom use is increasing in the US, yet data characterizing use patterns, risks, and benefits is limited. Additionally, there are few data on the acute subjective effects of kratom in humans, and no studies to-date have examined kratom use within US public consumption settings, which have become increasingly popular in recent years. Methods: Using field methods, we administered surveys to 102 ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in northern Colorado. Surveys assessed demographic information, kratom use patterns, perceived benefits, and adverse reactions. We also assessed subjective drug effects acutely after participants consumed kratom at the bars. Data were analyzed using a mixed-methods approach. Results: Participants (mean age=22.34 years, 39.2 % women), reported frequent kratom use (73.4 % endorsed weekly use, 19.3 % endorsed daily use). Reported benefits included mental and physical health benefits, social enhancement, and substance use harm reduction. Adverse reactions primarily involved gastrointestinal issues, though acute psychological effects (e.g., anxiety), and withdrawal symptoms were also cited. Kratom use in a bar setting was associated with acute stimulation and mild euphoria, and minimal sedation. Conclusions: While most participants reported perceived benefits, the presence of adverse reactions highlight the need for more data on safety and risks of kratom use, particularly within public consumption spaces. Results also highlight the possible role of kratom in supporting substance use disorder recovery, with some ethnobotanical tea bars potentially functioning as recovery spaces.

Indexed as

ethnobotanical tea barsfield surveyskratomMitragyna speciosamixed methods

Identifiers

PMID40823326
PMCPMC12355151

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.