ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Embodied metaphors and interpersonal synchrony in the digital age: the case of remote working.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Reviewing digital collaborative interactions with multimodal hyperscanning through an ever-growing database.Frontiers in neuroergonomics · 2026Pooled it
- A grounded theory study in blended learning of the facilitation of role transition from compliant learners to collaborative partners regarding non-verbal behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- When the evolved social mind goes online: How digital ecologies recalibrate mentalizing and social bonding.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Reconfiguring home language practices in AI-mediated environments: a layered communication perspective on language transmission, affect, and multilingual communication.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the impact of technology-mediated (TM) communication on interpersonal synchrony through the integrated lens of social neuroscience, embodied cognition, and Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). It focuses particularly on the case of remote working, which exemplifies the challenges and adaptations required when social interactions shift from face-to-face (FTF) to digital environments. While FTF communication enables interpersonal synchrony through rich sensorimotor cues, such as gaze, posture, and gesture, TM communication often reduces or distorts these embodied signals. This disconnection undermines critical neurobiological processes like mirror neuron activation and impairs shared intentionality, emotional resonance, and trust. The paper highlights how embodied metaphors, especially CLOSENESS IS INTIMACY, are destabilized in digital contexts, making social engagement more cognitively demanding and less intuitive. Despite these limitations, humans show adaptability, developing compensatory behaviors and recalibrating expectations over time. However, remote working environments often lack the embodied coherence necessary to fully support collaborative creativity and social cohesion. The paper argues for the redesigning of digital platforms with immersive, multisensory interfaces, such as haptic feedback and spatialized audio, that better simulate the embodied dynamics of FTF interactions. It calls for future research employing hyperscanning and ecologically valid methods to understand how synchrony unfolds across digital modalities and how metaphorical coherence might be restored. Ultimately, by reengaging the body as a central substrate for cognition and communication, this work advocates for a more human-centered evolution of remote work technologies that sustains connection, trust, and collective performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.