Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Orthostatic Hypotension.
Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between orthostatic hypotension and related factors in hospitalised older adults: a cross-sectional study in Turkey.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Testing patients for orthostatic hypotension in less than a minute is better than not testing at all.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Orthostatic Hypotension and Postural Tachycardia Following Sedated Colonoscopy: A Prospective Observational Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Orthostatic Hypotension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common inpatient condition associated with falls, syncope, and mortality. However, standardized approaches for inpatient management of OH are lacking and may vary across clinical specialties. In this retrospective observational cohort study, we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients admitted to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between April 1, 2015 and June 1, 2021 with a diagnosis of OH or medication-related hypotension. Variables of interest included admitting service, presenting symptoms, suspected etiology, and management. Among the 400 inpatients with OH, one-third had OH documented on admission. Dizziness and lightheadedness were the most common symptoms; medical patients experienced dizziness, falls, and other symptoms more frequently than surgical patients. Volume depletion and medications were the leading suspected causes of OH. Surgical patients were less likely to have medication-related OH and were more likely to lack an identified etiology. Cardiovascular disease was more frequently implicated in cardiology patients. Volume depletion, neurodegenerative disease, and other conditions were more often suspected among medical patients. Management commonly involved volume resuscitation and medication adjustment, though medication changes were less frequent in surgical patients. Nonpharmacologic interventions were more common among medical patients. By discharge, OH had resolved in only one-third of patients. In summary, inpatient OH was most often identified after admission, attributed to hypovolemia, treated with fluids, and unresolved at discharge, with differences in symptoms, etiology, and management between specialties. Prospective studies are needed to formalize diagnostic and treatment strategies for OH in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.