Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823801›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2025

Research Bias in Long-Term Monitoring of Antarctic Nearshore Marine and Terrestrial Biota.

Shae L Jones, Diana H King, Vonda J Cummings, Sharon A Robinson, Melinda J Waterman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shae L JonesSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-9236
Diana H KingSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6313-4450
Vonda J CummingsNew Zealand Institute for Earth Science, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1076-3995
Sharon A RobinsonSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7130-9617
Melinda J WatermanSecuring Antarctica's Environmental Future (SAEF), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-4512

Funding

Australian Antarctic Division AAS 4516Australian Antarctic Division AAS 4644Australian GovernmentAustralian Research Council DP200100223Australian Research Council FL240100032Australian Research Council SR200100005National Institute for Water & Atmospheric Research SSIF CEME2502New Zealand Government MBIE ANTA1801Scientific Committee on Antarctic ResearchUniversity of Wollongong Global Challenges Program ID91
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term observations are essential for ecological research, providing insights into species and ecosystem variability, processes, and responses to change. In a time of rapid global change, ecosystem modification, and emerging threats, such long-term monitoring (LTM) is increasingly important. Antarctica is experiencing an unprecedented change that is potentially challenging for its uniquely adapted flora and fauna. This review synthesizes LTM studies of Antarctic nearshore and terrestrial biota, examining monitored species, sites, biological parameters, and environmental factors. LTM of Antarctic biota was limited (< 140 studies) and strongly biased toward charismatic megafauna (> 60% focused on penguins and marine mammals). More than half of the studies spanned > 10 years, ~80% exceeded 5 years, and ~60% included environmental data to inform biological trends. Inconsistencies in methodologies were noted, which limit the capacity for cross-study comparisons. Changes in local and regional species' abundances, distributions, and/or functions were reported for many of the biota groups examined. LTM efforts were concentrated along the West Antarctic Peninsula, with notable gaps across East Antarctica, reflecting the varied accessibility across the continent. Based on the limitations and gaps identified in this review, we recommend LTM of Antarctic nearshore and terrestrial ecosystems should expand to include understudied key ecosystems and locations, use harmonized protocols to ensure data are comparable, and integrate environmental monitoring at biologically relevant scales. Establishing sentinel sites and facilitating international collaboration and data sharing would be a powerful approach to circum-Antarctic monitoring. LTM is essential not only for documenting and predicting ecological responses in Antarctica but also for informing global understanding of ecosystem resilience under climate change-providing critical data for conservation, management, and policy in a rapidly transforming world.

Indexed as

BiotaEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsAntarctic RegionsBiodiversityClimate ChangeEcosystemAntarcticabiological monitoringbirdsinvertebratesmammalsnearshore marineterrestrialvegetation

Identifiers

PMID40823801
PMCPMC12360029

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.