Who was studied, and how
Four numbers in the abstract
Where each one falls
Where it lands on the map
The trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
Reported higher neointimal thickness, no range given+136
randomisedAmong patients with lipid-laden neointima, the trial randomly assignedassigned by chance
Reported higher minimal fibrous cap thickness, no range given+218
randomisedthe abstract, start to end
Neointimal thickness (136.2 ± 71.1 vs. 151.4 ± 101.4 μm, P = 0.45) and the …
… group than in the placebo group (217.5 ± 122.5 vs. 87.8 ± 49.1 μm, P = 0.02).