ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Preparation duration shapes the goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex responses.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stretch reflex responses counteract sudden perturbations, and modulation of reflex gains can facilitate voluntary movement. Recent studies suggest movement preparation includes goal-directed tuning of muscle spindles and an equivalent modulation of both short- and long-latency stretch reflex responses (SLR and LLR), as long as the preparatory delay between 'Cue' and 'Go' exceeds 250 ms. The current study aimed to clarify the minimal preparation time required for goal-directed modulation of SLR and LLR responses and to determine how such modulation progressively evolves with extended preparation. We recorded bipolar electromyographic signals of healthy participants to assess reflex responses to mechanical perturbations induced by a robotic manipulandum in the context of a delayed-reach task. Specifically, we examined how multiple preparatory delays (250, 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 ms) impact the goal-directed modulation of SLR and LLR responses from the loaded or unloaded pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and posterior deltoid muscles. We found that preparatory delays of 300 ms and 350 ms are sufficient for goal-directed tuning of SLR responses in the posterior deltoid and pectoralis muscles, respectively. Our results also suggest that unloading (i.e., antagonist loading) may facilitate both the earlier emergence and more robust expression of goal-directed SLR tuning. Goal-directed tuning of LLR responses emerged as early as 250 ms of preparation, and such tuning was robust against muscle load conditions, in line with previous findings. We observed no consistent increase in SLR tuning at preparation delays that extended beyond the required minimum, whereas such enhancement was observed at the LLR epoch. These findings clarify the temporal characteristics of goal-directed stretch reflex gains, which likely emerge through the interplay of multiple feedback mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.