ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Machine learning driven diagnostic pathway for clinically significant prostate cancer: the role of micro-ultrasound.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shifting from black box decisions to informed decision-making in using artificial intelligence to analyze prostate MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION &
objectivesDetecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) remains a top priority in delivering high-quality care, yet consensus on an optimal diagnostic pathway is constantly evolving. In this study, we present an innovative diagnostic approach, leveraging a machine learning model tailored to the emerging role of prostate micro-ultrasound (micro-US) in the setting of csPCa diagnosis. MATERIALS &
methodsWe queried our prospective database for patients who underwent Micro-US for a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer. CsPCa was defined as any Gleason group grade > 1. Primary outcome was the development of a diagnostic pathway which implements clinical and radiological findings using machine learning algorithm. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing subsets. Boruta algorithms was used for variable selection, then based on the importance coefficients multivariable logistic regression model (MLR) was fitted to predict csPCA. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model was fitted to create the decision tree. Accuracy of the model was tested using receiver characteristic curve (ROC) analysis using estimated area under the curve (AUC).
resultsOverall, 1422 patients were analysed. Multivariable LR revealed PRI-MUS score ≥ 3 (OR 4.37, p < 0.001), PI-RADS score ≥ 3 (OR 2.01, p < 0.001), PSA density ≥ 0.15 (OR 2.44, p < 0.001), DRE (OR 1.93, p < 0.001), anterior lesions (OR 1.49, p = 0.004), prostate cancer familiarity (OR 1.54, p = 0.005) and increasing age (OR 1.031, p < 0.001) as the best predictors for csPCa, demonstrating an AUC in the validation cohort of 83%, 78% sensitivity, 72.1% specificity and 81% negative predictive value. CART analysis revealed elevated PRIMUS score as the main node to stratify our cohort.
conclusionsBy integrating clinical features, serum biomarkers, and imaging findings, we have developed a point of care model that accurately predicts the presence of csPCa. Our findings support a paradigm shift towards adopting MicroUS as a first level diagnostic tool for csPCa detection, potentially optimizing clinical decision making. This approach could improve the identification of patients at higher risk for csPca and guide the selection of the most appropriate diagnostic exams. External validation is essential to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40824495What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.