Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824495›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Machine learning driven diagnostic pathway for clinically significant prostate cancer: the role of micro-ultrasound.

Cesare Saitta, NicolòMaria Buffi, Pierpaolo Avolio, Edoardo Beatrici, Marco Paciotti, Massimo Lazzeri, Vittorio Fasulo, Ludovica Cella, Giuseppe Garofano, Andrea Piccolini and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cesare SaittaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
NicolòMaria BuffiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Pierpaolo AvolioDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Edoardo BeatriciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Marco PaciottiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Massimo LazzeriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Vittorio FasuloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Ludovica CellaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Giuseppe GarofanoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Andrea PiccoliniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Roberto ContieriDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy.
Sebastiano NazzaniDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Carlo SilvaniDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Mario CatanzaroDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Nicola NicolaiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Rodolfo HurleDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Paolo CasaleDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Alberto SaitaDepartment of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Giovanni LughezzaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve, Emanuele, Italy. g.lughezzani@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION &

objectivesDetecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) remains a top priority in delivering high-quality care, yet consensus on an optimal diagnostic pathway is constantly evolving. In this study, we present an innovative diagnostic approach, leveraging a machine learning model tailored to the emerging role of prostate micro-ultrasound (micro-US) in the setting of csPCa diagnosis. MATERIALS &

methodsWe queried our prospective database for patients who underwent Micro-US for a clinical suspicious of prostate cancer. CsPCa was defined as any Gleason group grade > 1. Primary outcome was the development of a diagnostic pathway which implements clinical and radiological findings using machine learning algorithm. The dataset was divided into training (70%) and testing subsets. Boruta algorithms was used for variable selection, then based on the importance coefficients multivariable logistic regression model (MLR) was fitted to predict csPCA. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model was fitted to create the decision tree. Accuracy of the model was tested using receiver characteristic curve (ROC) analysis using estimated area under the curve (AUC).

resultsOverall, 1422 patients were analysed. Multivariable LR revealed PRI-MUS score ≥ 3 (OR 4.37, p < 0.001), PI-RADS score ≥ 3 (OR 2.01, p < 0.001), PSA density ≥ 0.15 (OR 2.44, p < 0.001), DRE (OR 1.93, p < 0.001), anterior lesions (OR 1.49, p = 0.004), prostate cancer familiarity (OR 1.54, p = 0.005) and increasing age (OR 1.031, p < 0.001) as the best predictors for csPCa, demonstrating an AUC in the validation cohort of 83%, 78% sensitivity, 72.1% specificity and 81% negative predictive value. CART analysis revealed elevated PRIMUS score as the main node to stratify our cohort.

conclusionsBy integrating clinical features, serum biomarkers, and imaging findings, we have developed a point of care model that accurately predicts the presence of csPCa. Our findings support a paradigm shift towards adopting MicroUS as a first level diagnostic tool for csPCa detection, potentially optimizing clinical decision making. This approach could improve the identification of patients at higher risk for csPca and guide the selection of the most appropriate diagnostic exams. External validation is essential to confirm these results.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUltrasonographyActive surveillanceAIimaging-guided diagnosisMachine learningMicro-UltrasoundMRIPI-RADSPRI-MUSProstate cancerTargeted biopsy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.