Evidence mapPaperPMID 40824911Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

How fast-and-frugal trees can inform diagnostic and intervention decisions for enhancing elite athlete performance.

Lena Siebert, Lukas Reichert, Lisa Musculus, Laura Will, Ahmed Al-Ghezi, Markus Raab, Karen Zentgraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lena SiebertMovement and Exercise Science, Institute of Sports Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9955-1059
Lukas ReichertMovement and Exercise Science, Institute of Sports Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Lisa MusculusDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Laura WillDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ahmed Al-GheziInstitute of Computer Science, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Markus RaabDepartment of Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6546-1666
Karen ZentgrafMovement and Exercise Science, Institute of Sports Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The key to fostering the individual potential of an elite athlete lies in deciding what to prioritize in training. Heuristic decision tools such as fast-and-frugal trees (FFTrees) have proven to be effective and suitable for identifying promising determinants in this context. FFTrees are binary decision trees that can make decisions based on only one reason. The objective of this study was to examine the applicability of FFTrees to inform intervention decisions in elite athletes. We aimed to create FFTrees and evaluate their ability to determine individually beneficial interventions. We collected cognitive, psychosocial, and motor-performance diagnostic data from 466 German elite athletes in different sports disciplines. First, we used principal component analysis to identify components representing types of interventions across sports. These served as cues for the FFTrees. As a result, the PCA identified six cues. Two sport-specific FFTrees were created using these six cues. One FFTree was created for trampoline with four cues (relative grip strength, motor cost, motor inhibition, visual selective attention) and 90% correct predictions. The other FFTree was created for volleyball with four cues (motor inhibition, motor cost, countermovement jump, Y-Balance Test) and 75% correct predictions. To conclude, the high accuracy confirms that FFTrees enable data-based decisions for interventions based on sport-specific demands and the preferences of coaches. We argue that FFTrees are beneficial in projects collecting multidisciplinary variables for personalizing interventions in elite athletes. Coaching practice benefits from using FFTrees by providing reference values when an intervention could enhance performance. In the future, we advocate that team sports develop position-specific FFTrees. In conclusion, FFTrees empower decision-makers by efficiently identifying athletes' adaptation potentials.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceDecision MakingDecision TreesAdultFemaleHumansMalePrincipal Component AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40824911
PMCPMC12360579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.