ArticlePloS one2025
How fast-and-frugal trees can inform diagnostic and intervention decisions for enhancing elite athlete performance.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigating the coach's eye when evaluating and selecting 3 × 3 basketball players.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The key to fostering the individual potential of an elite athlete lies in deciding what to prioritize in training. Heuristic decision tools such as fast-and-frugal trees (FFTrees) have proven to be effective and suitable for identifying promising determinants in this context. FFTrees are binary decision trees that can make decisions based on only one reason. The objective of this study was to examine the applicability of FFTrees to inform intervention decisions in elite athletes. We aimed to create FFTrees and evaluate their ability to determine individually beneficial interventions. We collected cognitive, psychosocial, and motor-performance diagnostic data from 466 German elite athletes in different sports disciplines. First, we used principal component analysis to identify components representing types of interventions across sports. These served as cues for the FFTrees. As a result, the PCA identified six cues. Two sport-specific FFTrees were created using these six cues. One FFTree was created for trampoline with four cues (relative grip strength, motor cost, motor inhibition, visual selective attention) and 90% correct predictions. The other FFTree was created for volleyball with four cues (motor inhibition, motor cost, countermovement jump, Y-Balance Test) and 75% correct predictions. To conclude, the high accuracy confirms that FFTrees enable data-based decisions for interventions based on sport-specific demands and the preferences of coaches. We argue that FFTrees are beneficial in projects collecting multidisciplinary variables for personalizing interventions in elite athletes. Coaching practice benefits from using FFTrees by providing reference values when an intervention could enhance performance. In the future, we advocate that team sports develop position-specific FFTrees. In conclusion, FFTrees empower decision-makers by efficiently identifying athletes' adaptation potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.