Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825130›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Multisensory feedback makes swimming circuits robust against spinal transection and enables terrestrial crawling in elongate fish.

Kotaro Yasui, Astha Gupta, Qiyuan Fu, Shura Suzuki, Jeffrey Hainer, Laura Paez, Keegan Lutek, Jonathan Arreguit, Takeshi Kano, Emily M Standen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kotaro Yasui *Frontier Research Institute for Interdisciplinary Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8199-581X
Astha Gupta *Biorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8213-9564
Qiyuan FuBiorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-4555
Shura SuzukiResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5392-2346
Jeffrey HainerDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Laura PaezBiorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Keegan LutekDepartment of Biology, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085.
Jonathan ArreguitBiorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Takeshi KanoSchool of Systems Information Science, Future University Hakodate, Hakodate 041-8655, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2033-4695
Emily M StandenDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-1957
Auke J IjspeertBiorobotics Laboratory, Institute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland.
Akio IshiguroResearch Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.

Funding

EC | European Research Council (ERC) 951477Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) RGP0027/2017MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23K13349MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23KK0072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate locomotion is due to the interplay of neural oscillators and sensory feedback loops in the spinal cord that interact with the body and the environment. Here, we study these circuits with a focus on undulatory locomotion as produced by elongated fish such as eels and lampreys. We address three questions: i) How do proprioception (stretch feedback) and exteroception (pressure on skin) interact with local oscillators to generate stable swimming patterns? ii) Can these feedback loops also contribute to dry ground locomotion? iii) Can they explain the remarkable robustness of eels against spinal cord transections? To address these questions, we developed abstract models of the locomotion circuits based on coupled phase oscillators, local stretch and pressure feedback loops, and simulated muscle models that were tested both in simulation and with a real undulatory robot. We also performed swimming experiments with eels before and after spinal cord transections. We found that stretch and pressure feedback work well together in swimming, as they contribute to rapid pattern generation and can, in principle, both replace direct couplings between oscillators. Interestingly, the swimming controllers could generate good ground locomotion when placed in an arena with pegs. For ground locomotion, the stretch feedback is more beneficial than pressure feedback. Finally, our models could replicate the remarkable ability of eels to keep swimming shortly after a full spinal cord transection. We found that stretch feedback and the ability of oscillators to spontaneously oscillate are likely explanations for keeping the neural oscillators active and coordinated below the transection.

Indexed as

EelsFeedback, SensorySpinal Cord InjuriesSwimmingAnimalsLampreysLocomotionProprioceptionSpinal Cordamphibious locomotioncomputational modelneuromechanicspressure and stretch feedbackspinal cord transection

Identifiers

PMID40825130
PMCPMC12403005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.