ArticleScientific reports2025
Digital biomarkers for interstitial glucose prediction in healthy individuals using wearables and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanostructured electrode materials and flexible-substrate engineering for wearable multi-analyte biosensors in diabetes monitoring and personalized care: a comprehensive review.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and precision medicine.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A personalized low-glycemic diet, maintaining stable blood glucose levels, aids in weight reduction and managing (pre-)diabetes and migraines in individuals. However, invasiveness, high cost, and limited lifecycle of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices restrict their widespread use. To address these issues, we investigated machine learning (ML) approaches for glucose monitoring using data from non-invasive wearables. Our study comprised two phases involving healthy participants: The main study included two experimental sessions lasting 7-8 h with two standardized test meals, totaling over 1550 interstitial glucose (IG) measurements with CGM, and high-frequency multimodal data collected by two different non-invasive sensor devices. The follow-up study involved more than 14,400 IG measurements. Using ML approaches, correlations between glycemic measures and sensor data were assessed to estimate the feasibility of accurately predicting personalized IG alterations in real-time. An ensemble feature selection-based light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithm, omitting the need for food logs, was developed. This algorithm achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 18.49 ± 0.1 mg/dL and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 15.58 ± 0.09%, demonstrating the feasibility of non-invasive glucose monitoring with high accuracy, which paves the way for novel approaches in the objective prevention of diet-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.