ArticleScientific reports2025
Genome-wide interaction study of physical activity and genetic susceptibility on colorectal cancer using UK biobank data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic risk factors modulate the association between physical activity and colorectal cancer.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Post-mastectomy pain syndrome and sleep disorders: effects of physical activity.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is influenced by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition and lifestyle factors, such as physical activity (PA). We aimed to conduct a genome-wide interaction study (GWIS) to explore single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and genes modulated by PA on CRC risk using data from the UK Biobank. Among 272,270 eligible participants, 2,979 CRC cases were matched with 11,435 controls using a incidence density matching approach to avoid potential biases that may arise when using excessively large unmatched control groups, and to preserve comparability in the timing and distribution of exposure. PA was defined as whether individuals met the international criteria. We used conditional logistic regression models to assess the significance for the SNP x PA interaction on CRC, and we also performed gene-level analysis by aggregating the results of SNP-level analysis. Several SNPs showed nominal interaction signals with p < 5 × 10⁻⁶, including loci mapped to ABI3, ZBTB16, and GABRB3, though none reached significance after FDR correction. Interaction and main effects were often in opposite directions. At the gene and pathway levels, RNASEL, NSD1, and efferocytosis showed nominal signals, although none reached statistical significance after correction. Although we could not find associations that met the significance threshold after adjusting for multiple testing, these preliminary findings help us to understand the interplay between genes and lifestyle in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.